Does Genesis refer to the Tatwams of the Vedas?

Wishing all of you and your dear ones the very best for 2017 and beyond…

As we are about begin the new year (calendar year that most part of the world celebrate) I was looking at wondering how everything began and then thought of creation itself, the very beginning, and the very essence. And thought it fit to share some of my findings from my research on the Vedas. I will make it a point to share with my readers at every stage of my research and progress. I would like to begin this year with the ‘Genesis’ itself (the very beginning, the apex).

This is an important subject by itself and we cannot afford to deal with it fully here. I would like to point out some salient points to our beloved readers, so as to enable them to grasp the exact mistakes which led to the miserable misinterpretation of a highly scientific matter.

If only we read a little carefully the first 10 paras of Chapter I, Genesis, we could easily discover the following facts as plainly stated therein. “God created heaven and earth. But the earth was then void and without form. It was all waters. The spirit of God then moved upon the face of the waters. God then created day and night. He then created the firmament in the midst of the waters. He thus divided the waters from the waters, by placing the waters above and below the firmament. The firmament then became heaven, and the waters below it became land and sea.”

Now, we find nothing said about the waters above the heaven. Probably God forgot all about them or has reserved them for future creation or for a future deluge in a fit of anger. Such is exactly the description furnished in the Genesis. No hairsplitting could alter the text now. The reputed Western critics of the Eastern books have probably said nothing about this curious creation of the universe as explained in their holy Bible.

Even the blind could perceive here that all the confusion is traceable to the utter ignorance of the technical significance of a single word namely waters. What doubt is there now about the fact that the above description was borrowed from somewhere without understanding the gist of it? The holy Bible cannot afford to deny that its contents are intended for religious instruction. Otherwise, it could not be styled holy. If it contains only history and geography as interpreted at present, it must necessarily lose its vale as a holy text. That is a serious matter for the Christian to consider in their own interest. As literally interpreted by the Christian authorities at present, has the above description any scientific, religious or practical value?

There is not the slightest doubt now that the Jews to whom the Old Testament belongs borrowed the Genesis or Purana both meaning the account of creation, from the Hindu literature through the help of our own Pseudo Pandit centuries ago, in spite of the so called Puranic period. The technical word that created all this ludicrous confusion is no other than ‘Apa’ which is even now foolishly misinterpreted by the quasi-educated Pundits as waters in India itself. APA refers only to the 24 sacred Tatwams (deep philosophical analysis of the Paramatma (Supreme Being)). The Purana describes only the creation of the 24 Tatwams which form the divine bases of the total cosmology of man. It does not treat of human history or earthly geography as foolishly misunderstood at present. The general name of the 24 Tatwams is ‘Apa’ or that by which the Ultimate Entity is discovered. AaPyte Aneneit Aap>, 

APA is always plural in Sanskrit and its translation into the same plural number as waters is sufficiently significant for our present purpose. This much is enough to understand the technical mistakes which misled the Jews in utilizing the incorrect information gathered from our own wiseacres. Besides this unhappy mistake, there is a more pitiable one which demands our immediate notice in this connection.

Even the philosophers of the West will surely admit that each man has his own specific cosmological conception. No two men have the same.  It is a purely philosophical matter which no civilized nation dare question. It is thus illogical and unscientific even to talk of a general creation of this material universe at any particular period. The conception of the Jagat is always mainly personal. Each man conceives differently, and separate descriptions of the creation of each man’s cosmology will have to be furnished. This is physically impossible. That is no function of the religious Puranas either. They are intended for more serious and useful religious (read Dharmic) purposes.

The vague and unscientific conception of a personal God creating a gross material universe as mentioned in the Old Testament, is entirely strange to Hindu philosophy. The God of the foreign religions is not even equal to the Iswara who directs the Buddhi of man according to the merits of his Karmas. This Iswara is only hypothesized to explain this Karmic Law to the inferior intellects. Iswara is treated only as the reflection of Brahman in Satwic Maya. Thus there are several distinct matters scientifically explained in our religious philosophy namely, the Brahman, the Satwic Maya, the Iswara, the Jiva, the Buddhi, the Avidya and the Jagat. Let me reproduce a Sanskrit shloka from the Upanishads.

ka buiÏ> kae=yma-as> kae va ýÇ jgtœ kwmœ, #Tyin[Rytae maeh> sae=y< s<sar #:yte.

 “What is Buddhi, who is the reflection of Atma, what is Atma and what is Jagat? Unless these are clearly understood one could not hope to get out of his ignorance.”

Our religious ( read Dharmic) literature which is thousands of years old, thus contains the highest philosophical truths which are not yet understood by the alien nations, but still the Christian Sanskritists, the Western Indologists and the historians of the West ( viz: Monier Williams, Max Muller, Dr Annie Besant, Windy Doniger, Sheldon Pollock to name a few and of course our own many Indian authors and writers who have interpreted the Vedic Philosophy literally) have the audacity to condemn our sacred literature as the product of barbarism and old world simplicity. 

The Ancestors of the westerners thought that their God has created everything imperfect in the beginning and that they were rendering them perfect. The present generation follow the footsteps of their Ancestors.  The contents of their holy book could not lead them to better or more sensible conclusions. If they sincerely wish to improve themselves, they must willingly borrow and correctly copy. Instead of doing so sensibly, why foolishly take to abuse?

To be continued...................

HariOm

Navratri/Durga Pooja/Durga Ashtami

As many people in different parts of the world celebrate the Ten days Durga Puja/Dussehra / Durga Ashtami let us understand the significance of Durga Puja or Durga Ashtami.

Let us understand the terms Prakriti, Shakti, Devi:

“The term Prakriti is explained as follows in accordance with its root meaning. In the Vedas Pra means superior or first, and Kriti is creation. Pra again means Satwa, Kri Reja and Ti Tama. Prakriti thus represents the all-powerful Shakti possessing the three Gunas.

The Atma divided itself into two, the male on the right side and the female on left which is known as Prakriti. The two stands in the relation of fire and its heat, and the Yogis therefore do not recognize any difference between male and female.

In her act of creation, Prakriti is distinguished as of five forms.

1. Durga, the mother of Ganesa, is the first form representing the underlying principle of all the vegetable and other lives.
2. Lakshmi is the second form representing the glories observable in heaven and earth.
3. Saraswati is the third form representing the real knowledge that removes all doubts.
4. Savitri or Gayatri, the mother of the Vedas, Sandhya, Mantras and Tantras, is the fourth form representing the Brahmaic lustre and energy.
5. Radha, residing in Go-loka in the form of a Gopi is the fifth form representing the five vital airs. She is seen by the Yogis by meditation according to the methods prescribed in the Vedas.

Sak means glory and Ti is valour. Shakti is the form of both. Bhaga means prosperity and Buddhi and Bhagavati is their form. Radha and Sarva-mangala allude to the power of granting liberation. Amba means mother of the Jagat. Being created by Vishnu, she is Vaishnavi. Gowri means the Shakti pertaining to the Gurus or masters, namely Siva and Krishna. Parvati refers to the Parvas or the holy festive occasions on which she is worshipped. Sanatani means existing without Gunas at all times and places. Kritika refers to the Kalas of Prakriti representing the six Yogas. Durga refers to the Shakti of Hari that destroys fear, enemies, diseases and sins. The Shakti that bestows the highest bliss is called Sivaa. Abhaya refers to the destruction of fear. The Shakti that bestows prosperity and liberation is called Maya and Vishnu-Bhakti. Narayani means born from half the body of Narayana. Jaya means granting victory.”

Several names of the Devi are explained mostly by their root meanings. They refer to the various stages of religious development in man, each of them being technically important and distinct in its use. It is not therefore enough to explain, like some of the Pseudo Pundits that all these terms apply to the Devi. 

Every technical term in the sciences could otherwise be explained by any ignorant person as simply applying to the sciences. It will be clearly evident here that even single letters in the given names are separated into consonants and vowels and their Vedic significance explained. When such detailed explanations on doubtful points in the religious literature are not forthcoming from the Pundit, the correct inference is that he knows them not, and not that the texts are silent in the matter.

Asuras and Rakshasas are not the so called demons or cannibals (Annie Besant’s ( sanatana dharma) other western sanskritists' and some of our own Indian Authors' mis interpretations ) who eat the flesh of human beings and rule the nether world.  They are our lower desires which need to be destroyed by Pranayama through the strength of "Bhīma" (breathing out of the Asuras and breathing in the Devas).                

Mahisham in Sanskrit also refers to ignorance or lower desires. Rakshasas also denote the diminution in the duration of the day and metaphorically refers to the sins of man that obstruct the real knowledge of Brahman’.

Durga as mentioned earlier refers to the Shakti of Hari that destroys fear, enemies, diseases and sins and therefore refers to knowledge. The four arms of Durga refer to managing the aham (ego), Gunas, the sword or mace to ward off evil and lower desires. Durga Ashtami refers to the knowledge acquired to kill ignorance to ward off lower desires. (Mahisasura)

The Devi is here explained in the plainest terms as referring to the highest philosophical knowledge. Her worship is prescribed for the liberation of man from his bondage.

Which of the sects of modern interpreters now stand in need of further information to be convinced of their ignorance and mistake?

There are of course several varieties of the modern editions of this Devi, specially manufactured to help on the inclinations to drinks and animal food. The Devi of our ancient religion is however clearly explained in the quotation, as having no jurisdiction over this material world.

From the conception of Brahma downwards, everything is classed under Prakriti and styled feminine. The story of Mahisha is repeated in this quotation also, almost in the same words, and explained in the same manner. Most of the names of Devi here given, such as, Gnana, Kriya, Yoga, Satya etc are too plain to be misunderstood as referring to beings in human form. Some of the Pseudo Pundits however would be glad to manufacture concrete forms for every word in the text, as he is unable to conceive anything useful without a tangible form for his artistic eye.

The Apsaras represent different stages of attainment in the practice of Yoga and refer more particularly to the Siddhis or powers resulting there from. They are not therefore the common dancing girls in heaven, perhaps somewhat better looking and better decorated. The religious heaven is certainly not the abode of debauchery and concubinage.

The worship of Shakti is intended for the advancement of those who have relinquished worldly desires and will never prove useful or effective to the worldly inclined.

The religious texts never treat of the means of satisfying man’s desires for women, animal food or intoxicating drinks. They are naturally sought for without special instructions. But the main object of religion is to rescue man from falling a victim to their consequent evils, by checking and reducing his objectionable propensities in that direction.

The knowledge of Brahman as distinguished from Brahman itself although the Shakti is its own, is the idea conveyed in the representations of Goddesses. The functions of the ultimate Shakti comprising creation, preservation and destruction cannot possibly therefore be mistaken for Agnana or ignorance with all its existing paraphernalia, known as the material world and its varying cosmological conceptions as formed by each individual. The Goddesses represented thus clearly point to the latent powers of the Absolute which may be profitably invoked for helping on in our march through the path of Gnana to the ultimate goal.

Now coming back to the Nine nights and ten days festival let us understand what these ten days festival denotes.

The Ten days of the festival or Puja refers to the purification of the ten Indriyas- Five Karma Indriyas and Five Gnana Indriyas of man by the necessary spiritual practices symbolically pointed out during the festivities for the ten days.

Five Karma Indriyas (active expressions): eliminating, reproducing, moving, grasping, speaking Five Gnana Indriyas (cognitive senses): smelling, tasting, hearing, touching, seeing

The Vigraha of Durga or any ‘Vigraha’ refers to deep analysis and understanding of the Paramatma (Supreme Being) within us: The word Idol is not an equivelant English word for  our superior Vigraha.

• The trident represents the three Gunas; 
• the four hands signify Satwa, Rejas, Tamas and Ahamkara. Sometimes you will see multiple hands denoting all directions of the material universe.
• Sanka (conch) represents five subtle elements and is placed in the hand which denotes Rejas. 
• Chakra ( discus) refers to "Manas" ( mind" which is unaltered like that of a child. 
• The Sarang (bow) represents Satwic Maya
• The mace ( gadha) which is always (to battle the  ignorance) 
• The lotus in the hand represents Viswam ( the 24 Tatwams)
• The two  bright ear rings refers to the eternal regions.  

Unless this exact technical significance is understood at the time of performing Puja, the "Vigraha" cannot serve its purpose. 

The different details of a Vigraha are the technical doorways provided for are insight into the true nature of the Devi.  The Vigrahas are thus an artistic concretization of the extremely philosophical principles explained in the Gnana-Kanda of the Vedas.

In the highest mental worship the Manas ( mind) itself serves as a Vigraha.

Wishing you a very happy Navratri, Durga Ashtami and Dussehra.

Hariom.

Sources:

Devi Bhagavatam

Bhagwad Gita

Shaktiopanishad

Vayu Purana

Brahmanda Purana

This is an extract from the book Inside-Out- a Philosophical Enquiry of Hindu Dharma© copyrighted by K V Vishwanathan. All rights reserved in all media.

What is Pranayama?

• Stopping all the external transactions is styled as ‘Pranayama’ ( Pranayama)

• To throw out all the illusory conceptions of the cosmos is “Rechaka”
• To take in the conception that ‘I am Brahman’ (thou and that- thath-thvam-asi) is “Pooraka”
• To retain the knowledge steadily is “Kumbhaka”.

This is the technical meaning of the Pranayama. Pranayama is not just regulation of breathing as most people might have (mis) understood. Pranayanama is the fourth out of the eight principles of Yoga. 

The process:

1)      Take your right hand thumb and second last finger (ring finger), hold it together and hold your nose.

2)      Release your breath (breathe out) from one side of the nostril. As you release your breath from the nostril throw out all illusory conceptions of the cosmos. Here the term illusory conceptions denote all material desires, which are merely illusions. Cosmos does not refer the physical cosmos but the inner cosmos. This is called “RECHAKA”

3)      Once you have done step no (2) then breathe in and take in the conception that ‘I am Brahman’. (The supreme). This is called “POORAKA”.

4)  Hold your breath for 30 seconds. This step is called as “KUMBHAKA”. This is to retain the knowledge that you have taken in. The knowledge that you are the ‘Brahman’. Realising yourself. For starters please start with 10 seconds and then gradually increase up to 30 else you might find it difficult to breathe.

Thus Pranayama therefore is not just any breathing exercise as understood and taught by many practitioners. ( yoga by itself is not just an exercise as mis understood by many across the world).The practice of Pranayama is a major part in the everyday (thrice a day) ‘Sandhyavandanam’ performed or to be performed by every one who is practicing the Hindu Dharma thus realizing the Brahman.

Was the term Bakri Id ill copied from the Pasu Medha Yegnas?

Was the term Bakri-Id copied from the Pasu Medha/Ashwa Medha  Yegnas?

To understand this we need to first know the meaning of the Yegnas, Sacrifice and Medhas as most Hindus themselves may have misinterpreted this.

All the Yegnas purely represent the concretized version of the instructions philosophically furnished in the Gnana-Kanda of the Vedas. The object of the Vedic Yegnas prescribed throughout the Karma-Kanda, is to sacrifice in the fire of Gnana all the gross conceptions and illusions of the unscientific cosmological conceptions of man, so that he may thereby secure the knowledge of Brahman. All other interpretations are sheer misinterpretations whether they proceed from the West or from the East, from the orthodoxy or the heterodoxy. 

The essence of the whole subject is explained in a single technical term called  Agnishomeeyam. It is the Pasu that pertains to the Agnishoma that has to be sacrificed.

A¶I;aemIy< pzumal-et, is the exact Vedic injunction given. pZytIit pzu>, 

All the gross un-philosophical conceptions of the cosmos, logically reduced to 7 Jyotishtoma sacrifices refer to the sacrifice of the Pasu  ( Pasu refers to the  brute animal nature in man). 

Even the term Aal-et means only to uproot. It is  historically, philologically, etymologically and arithmetically certain that no butchering of dumb animals was/is ordained anywhere within the sacred Karma-Kanda of the Vedas. No anti-Hindu in the East or West could be permitted to take undue advantage of the foolishness of a few ignorant Pandits and Dikshits, from whom the westerners had also learnt Sanskrit and the Vedas and to criticize Hindu Dharma on that false pretext.

There is a black sheep in every family. Nobody wants to deny it. There are even now murderers in every civilized country. None can deny it. No sensible Hindu in India in the past has ever sacrificed any animal in the name of religion; nor has he ( in the past) eaten the decaying flesh of dead animals. His Dharma ( referred as religion by the West) never permits such follies and cruelties much less orders them. In fact, the misfortunes of the innocent Hindus all along may well be traced to (i) their vegetarian ancestry and (ii) to their owning a scientific and sacred religion. Thus the Hindu became an eye-sore to every carnivorous nationality.

All the  present calamities of the Hindus are also due to these very two facts. Look at the persistent obstinacy of every anti-Hindu nation in its attempt to establish somehow or other that the Vedic Indian was a flesh-eater. If flesh-eating is a sign and proof of civilization as it is practically reckoned among the Western nations, vegetarianism is doubtless another proof of the barbarism of the Hindus in India. Why not they condemn them boldly for their vegetarianism too? That would be an honest method of abusing. But they know very well that flesh-eating and butchering were and are not very respectable traits. 

Every alien nation is thus smarting under that guilt feeling or culpable defect. That is just the reason why the blessed historians and the Sanskritists of the West are unanimously trying to pull down the vegetarian Hindu to their own carnivorous level. This is exactly the secret of dishonestly attributing animal-sacrifice to the Vedic Yegnas. That they are not prepared to refine themselves by leaving off carrion-eating is also an established fact here. We could therefore in no way respect or recognize them either as interpreters of our sacred literature or as the historians of Indian affairs.

Now coming to the origin of the word Bakri-Id,  ‘Id’ is the same word as Ishti or Yegna and Bakrid or cow-killing would have been ill-copied from Pasu-medha or Ashwa-medha .

 A¶I;aemIy< pzumal-et. “Root out the Pasu in the form of Agni and Soma.” This is a highly philosophical matter which many learned Vedic scholars would also agree and admit here. Agni and Soma refer to Vidya and Avidya, Mind and Matter, Prana and Apana etc.

pZytIit pzu>. All those that are perceivable by the senses are Pasus referring thereby to gross material conceptions. For religious (read Dharmic)  advancement, man must soar above this gross materiality and secure higher, subtler and more philosophical conceptions of them. This is the significance of the Pasu-medha. 

Some illiterate  Pundits/Dikshits in the  past must have foolishly misunderstood this as animal-sacrifice and substituted Aja or Sheep which term also they misunderstood without knowing its technical significance.  And,thanks to the mis interpretations and ill copying of our sacred literatures, many dumb animals are killed, sacrified and eaten off across. 

Ajs<}ain bIjain Dag< nae hNtumhRw. “Aja (A£j) here denotes seeds that have not sprouted, referring thereby to the Sanchita Karmas of man. No four-legged sheep which is also called Aja should therefore be foolishly butchered.” Whenever there are two meanings  for the same word, the context need to be ascertained.

The Pasu and the Aja as technically used do not therefore represent cows or sheep. The word Go also has similarly its technical meaning. It is too often confounded with cow or Pasu. Go in Sanskrit has several meanings. Vide Amara-kosa ( Thesaurus in Sanskrit by Amara Simha) Go is technically used to denote light or knowledge, as in Go-kulam, Gopi, Gopa, Go-vardhanam etc. It is misinterpreted as cow or Pasu in all of them. Pasu is technically used to denote gross materiality. But in the ill-copying and ill-borrowing both the terms Go and Pasu are mistranslated as cow. Prof. Max Muller & Co ( of the 19^th century fame) have mis-translated gvamyn< as “Cow’s walks”. What better rendering could then be expected in the three creeds ?

There were and are no yegnas commonly performed by Brahmanas where birds or animals are butchered.

‘Mriga Pakshi for sacrifice refer to the beastly passions and the Indriyas of man which should always be devoured by the Brahmana ( this has been wrongly interpreted as killing of birds or animals and few pieces of its flesh is eaten by the priest or the brahmanas-(sic!!))

Unless the material desires pertaining to the five gross elements basically described as Pancha Nakhas are swallowed up, the brahma Kshetram can never be perceived.

Ahimsa being the fundamental principle of Hinduism, the butchering of animals for food was/is not sanctioned, much less for religious purposes. The Yegnas as we have noticed refer only to the sacrifice of beastly passions and mean desires. 

ydÚa> pué;ae laeke tdÚaStSy devta>. “The Deva should be offered only the same food the devotee eats.” 

No animal sacrifice is therefore permitted much less recommended in Hinduism. Killing cows, sheep or any other animal is strictly prohibited. 

          

HariOm

How to welcome Lord Ganesha ( significance of Ganapati, ten days Utsav & Visarjan)

Om Ganesaya Namaha:

Since my child hood days I have been ( as most children then and even now are) fascinated by Lord Ganesha and have celebrated the ten days festival with pomp, show and with a sense of togetherness with fellow beings. This also included a ten days of merry making, screening movies, playing and dancing to the tune of the latest film songs, bands, savoring varieties of prasadams, other sweetmeats etc…

I always used to wonder why Ganapati is  like what he is, different from other deities that we see in images, pictures, movies etc. till few years ago when I bumped into a small article and thus began my quest. My search and research on Hindu philosophy, studying and learning Sanskrit mantras, Vedas ( still learning as one life time is not enough to read and understand) made me dive deep into understanding the technical essence of some of the mantras, the rituals and the festivals.

Following is the result of a short study on the Lord of Wisdom, Ganesha or Ganapati Bappa as we call and seek out…. I am sure you will give this a patient reading and  get ready to welcome Ganapati Bappa on August 25^th and worship him for the next ten days with a renewed focus.

zu¬a<brxr< iv:[u< zizv[¡ ctu-Rujmœ, àsÚvdn< Xyayetœ svRiv¹aepzaNtye.

Literal interpretations and sectarianism have greatly meddled with its sensible meaning and useful application.

It is commonly and readily interpreted as alluding to Ganesa, son of Siva, and he is said to possess the head of an elephant.  For this very reason the Vaishnavites have not accepted the sloka as forming part of their Sandhya-Vandanam. They have substituted something else pertaining to Vishnu. ( this refers to the senseless grounds on which Saivites and  Vaishnavites are divided) Let us here look into the literal interpretation of the verse itself. 

Literally it means this. “I meditate, for the removal of all obstructions, upon the divinity who is dressed in white cloth, who is Vishnu, who is white like the moon, who possesses four hands, and who has a smiling face.” Evidently this does not satisfy the Saivites.

iv:[u is therefore interpreted as all pervading, and àsÚvdn< as elephant-faced.  But Ganesa is commonly understood as red in colour.

Ø Why is he particularly invoked to remove obstructions in the very beginning of every ritual in preference to all other divinities?

Ø Does his elephant-face scare away all obstructors?

Ø Has the scholarly interpreter any idea of what this curious divinity signifies?

Ø Does the pseudo pundits’ enlightened admirer feel ashamed when the Western Sanskritists and Indologists (Wendy Doniger and gang…) make fun of this divinity with all their unbecoming and unwelcome ingenuity? 

No one can now deny that the technical significance of this important divinity has become a long forgotten affair if not a lost thing altogether. Through the sheer influence of lucre, the vices of the enlightened pretender of piety now unjustly pass off for the rarest virtues.

Under the present state of utter ignorance it is necessary here to gather all possible information regarding the divinity in question before we make an attempt to  understand its technical significance.

The following is from Ganapath-Upanishad.

(a) g[pTyupin;tœ. Tv< -Uimrapae=nlae=inlae n->,  Tv< cTvair vaKpdain, 

              Tv< mUlaxariSwtae=is inTymœ, Tv< ziKtÇyaTmk>, Tva< yaeignae XyayiNt inTymœ, 

              Aaiv-RUt< c s&ò(adaE àk«te> pué;aTprmœ, @v< Xyayit yae inTy< s yaegI yaeigna< vr>.

 “You represent the 5 subtle elements. You are the 4 vak-padas. You are always seated in the Mooladhara, you are in the form of the 3 Saktis, and you are meditated upon by the Yogis. Next to Prakriti and Purusha, you are the first created.  The Yogi who meditates thus is the greatest among the Yogis.”

Full technical description is clearly furnished here. Ganapati is the lord of the 5 subtle elements and is in the form of Sabda or (vak-pada) which is the highest among the Tanmatras.

The 4 vak-padas are

1  pra,

2  pZyNtI, 

3  mXyma and

4  vEorI,

vEorI refers to ordinary audible sound. mXyma refers to the low tone of it which is heard only to the utterer. pZyNtI refers to the mental state in which one wishes to produce the intended sound. pra refers to the Sakti or life principle without whose help no sound could be produced. Every sound having to arise from the Mooladhara upwards the divinity or the required Sakti is described as always stationed there.

This is an extremely technical subject relating to Mantra-saastra or the ‘Psycho-physiology of Mantric philosophy’. 

“Sabda originates from Sakti, Vak-bhava originates from Sabda, Kalas from Vak-bhava and Vikalas from Kalas. Mantra originates from these and is thus distinguished from ordinary language. This is known as the s&iò³m< or the process of creation described in the religious literature. The above terms are meant to be understood as follows. 

Sakti means desire and Sabda means Gnanam, Vak-bhava means Kriya-sakti. The Kalas represent the 16 vowels and the Vikalas refer to the consonants. #CDaziKt£zBd<£}an<£àitóa£vaG-v<£i³yaziKt£inv&iÄ are synonymous with Sakti.”

The above deserves to be carefully noticed as it deals with the very basis of a religious Mantra. It begins with #CDaziKt which clearly denotes the ardent desire for inv&iÄ or freedom from the bondage of Samsara.

Sakti means Samvit or Gnanam. If that is practically secured, no Mantra and Vydic karmas are needed.

The technical Sabda which constitutes a Mantra is therefore utilized at a lower stage of religious development. The divinity that helps us with the Mantric Sabda is thus said to originate from Sakti itself.

Ganapati who represents the divine basis of the four degrees of the Mantric-Sabda, cTvairvaKpdain is therefore Itihasically described as the son of Siva by Parvathi. 

Siva here represents the divine basis of the whole of human cosmology known as Maheshwara of the Vyakarana Sootrams, and Sivaa or Parvathi represents Gnanam or the highly developed Buddhi of man which realizes that there is nothing but Siva in reality.

 ywa -aten êpe[ izv @veit ya mit>, sa izva prma s<ivÚapra n ih s<zy>. 

She is also everywhere described as representing the religious Vidya which deals with Siva who is referred to in its Artha. Vide halaSymahaTMy< . ( extracts from Halasya Mahathmayam)

AwRraiz-Rvanœ sTy< zBdraizéma Øuvmœ.

Parvati here represents the collective and complete knowledge of the whole of our religious literature. Ganapati denotes only the divinity pertaining to the production of Mantric-sabdas and virtually refers to the philosophic meditation. Without the blessings of Eswara, no sounds could be produced by man. No Mantra should be begun without this meditation. mNÇStErev i-*te, 

As the Itihasas and Puranas are our recognized commentaries for such matters we are sure to obtain clearer and fuller informations from them. (As mentioned in my earlier posts, Puranas and Itihasas are not meaningless mythologies and absurd Indian histories; they are technical commentaries on Vedas.)

For example as per Vamana Purana: Vide  vamnpura[<. 

“The female florist suddenly appeared and reminded Parvati that it was time for bath. As soon as she disappeared, Parvati went to bathe, and made with her dirt a beautiful Gajanana possessing four hands and broad breast. She left the figure on the ground and commenced her usual Japam. The figure manufactured with the sweat of Parvati when associated with Earth and Water rose up roaring with its raised trunk. Knowing it to be the issue of Parvati, Siva took it and gave to Nandi.  After performing the daily religious rituals, Siva went to Parvati, kissed the child on its head in her presence and spoke thus. This is an excellent child born to you without my help. He is therefore named Vinayaka. He will remove all obstructions the Devas and others are labouring under.”

There is not much of intricacy in this Itihasic description. Gajanana born from the sweat of Parvati is named Vinayaka. gjœ itself means to roar or to sound,  and Gajanana directly denotes the basis of the Mantric Sabdas under reference.  As the lord of Sabda, Gajanana entirely belongs to Parvati and hence appropriately named Vinayaka. zBdraizéma Øuvmœ,  Ganapati is known also as  her<b.  he + r<b ;  means attached to Siva. Thus Ganapati verily signifies the divine basis of Mantric Sabdas which refer to the meditation of Siva. There is a valuable technical explanation furnished in the Padma-puranam regarding the Itihasic significance of the maedk< always kept in the trunk of Ganapati. pavRTyuvac. 

 “Parvati addressing Ganapati and Skanda said. This maedk< given by the Devas is prepared by them from Amritam and is designed Maha-budhi. By merely smelling it, one becomes immortal. He becomes also an expert in all the Sastras and Mantras, and becomes a good writer and artist.  As respect for one’s father is more valued than all the acts of Yoga, Tapas, Yegna  etc  I present this divine Modaka to Heremba. For this very reason, Heremba shall be first worshipped while commencing every religious ritual.”

The passage is too plain to be misinterpreted. The maedk<  kept in the trunk of Ganapati signifies Maha-budhi or nothing short of Mahat-Tatwam. This Modakam could be secured only by Heremba or one earnestly attached to Eswara. The meditation of Ganapati as the divine basis for all the religious Mantras is thus undoubtedly the first requisite of every religious ritual. But practically it is not a very easy matter. One has to think of the very root of the Mantric sounds he is going to utter and to meditate upon the divinity that enables him to produce them.  This is a highly intellectual feat. He has to soar high to the seat of Budhi itself. The knocking on the head with both fists at the commencement of every religious ritual is an extremely ingenious suggestion to get at the required philosophic conception by any amount of trouble. 

Vide muiKtkaepin;tœ for instance.

hSt< hSten s<pIf( dNtEdRNtanœ ivcU{yR c, A¼aNy¼E> sma³My jyedadaE Svk< mn>. 

“ Secure control over your Manas first either by squeezing your hands or by biting your teeth or by placing one limb over another forcibly.”

The control of Manas by any feasible means is advocated here as the most important requisite. Similarly the meditation of the basic divinity of the Mantric Sabdas is here insisted upon. Even this serious and practical ritual is now explained away as childish fun. Ignorance has advanced so far as to dispense with it altogether on sectarian grounds sometimes.

We have however now clearly understood that the divine Ganapati does not represent any meaningless ugly figure as commonly explained. Next to complete Gnana, he stands as the basic divinity for all the Vydic karmas ever suggesting the necessity of high philosophic meditation before commencing every religious ceremony.

Let us now return to the Vandana-Slokam itself.

zu¬a<brxr<, A<br< = Aakaz<, The lord of Akasa whose Guna is Sabda. iv:[u<, Vis- to enter. The divinity who helps us by kindly entering in the Mantric Sabdas we utter. zizv[¡, The divinity who is completely Satwic being as pure, white and cool as moonlight. ctu-Ruj<, Possessing four hands. The trunk which keeps the Modakam styled Mahabudhi represents the subtle Akasa and the four hands denote the remaining four subtle elements. àsÚvdn<, Possessing a gracious-looking face.  svRiv¹aepzaNtye, For the purpose of removing all the obstacles to the performance of the ritual. Xyayetœ, I meditate.

That Gana-pati technically represents the basic divinity of the 5 subtle elements has been already noticed. Tv< -Uimrapae=nlae=inlae n->, Ganapati is the Lord of the Gana or group of the five Elements and is therefore the biggest figure imaginable. The same idea is consistently carried through even in the instructions furnished for making His Vigraha. The measurement is 5 Thalams. ( one thalam means the palm of the hand)

Vide suà-edagm<, ;qœtalen tu gNxvaRnœ pÂtalae g[aixp>.

The modern scholarly Pandit and his students ( the western Sanskritists, western Indologists and their coteries ) has no doubt been over-anxious to make out an elephant-faced belly-god out of this Mantra which unfortunately contains nothing that would suit their quixotic interpretations. They have therefore, discovered a non-existent Dictionary. àsÚvdn they assure us as referring to the face of a mad elephant. àsÚaemÄvar[>, Evidently no poets worth the name have yet used the word in that sense. The fact is otherwise. àsÚae duòpi{ft>, gjann has been already noticed as referring to the face or base of Sabda itself, gjœ meaning to sound. A mere elephant figure without any reference to these technical facts would simply be a mere hallucination or madness. Many modern commentators have made a mockery of the invaluable Dharmic truths abounding in our sacred literature.

What is Ganesh Utsav?

An Utsava is defined thus.

sv #TyuCyte s&iòStdu SyaCDBd-ai;tmœ, %ÑUts&iòkarTvatœ %Tsv< kiwtae mya.

It refers undoubtedly to the high-class creation of the sacred Tatwams (philosophical analysis) The days of the festivals being generally limited to ten days, the creation here refers to the purification of the ten Indriyas of man by the necessary religious practices symbolically pointed out during the festivities continuing for ten days. This signifies the necessity of bestowing intellectual exercise to what is going on to be explained symbolically during the ten days of the festival. (most of the Hindu festivals are of ten days duration). 

How do you worship the Vigraha?

Vigraha refers to deep analysis and understanding of the Paramatma (Supreme Being) within us: the trident represents the three Gunas, the four hands signify Satwa, Rejas, Tamas and Ahamkara.  Sanka (conch) represents five subtle elements and is placed in the hand which denotes Rejas.  Chakra ( discus) refers to "Manas" ( mind" which is unaltered like that of a child, the Sarang (bow) represents Satwic Maya, the mace ( gadha) which is always (to battle the  ignorance), the lotus in the hand represents Viswam ( the 24 Tatwams), the two  bright ear rings refers to the eternal regions.  Unless this exact technical significance is understood at the time of performing Pooja or visiting any temple, the "Vigraha" cannot serve its purpose.

There is not the least smack of idolatry in Hinduism.

The various parts of the Vigraha serves as emblems of the highly philosophical features of the single deva for the benefit of inferior intellects to enable them to form a comprehensive view of the Deva.

Entire freedom from the bondage of samsara is the chief and the only object aimed at is prescribed Deva-arohanam.

Asking for worldly pleasures and prosperity does not however, fall within the province of the Aradhanam.

That from which something specifically, significantly should be understood is Vigraha.

The description of a typical Vedic Vigraha moorti

Symbols	Significance
Trident	Represents three Gunas- Satwa, Rejas, tamasic belonging to the Maya of Iswara
Diamond weapon	Unbreakability or the permanence of Iswara
The fire	Gnana which reduces all bondage to ashes and points to light or knowledge
Ten hands ( in some vigrahas)	Omnipresence, the eight quarters above and below making up the wide space imaginable
The Trunk	Which keeps the Modakam styled Mahabudhi which again represents the subtle Akasa
Four hands	Satwa, Rejas, Tamas and Ahamkara
Sanka ( conch)	Five subtle elements and is placed in the hand which denotes Rejas
Chakra ( disc)	Manas which is pure like that of a child
Saranga ( bow)	Satwik Maya.
Lotus in the hand	24 Tatwams
Gada or mace	Denotes the original Vidya which destroys Avidya
Umbrella	Denotes Brahma Loka beyond which is the region of the deity
Crown	Satwik Kootastha which is the Lakshyartha of Twam
The earrings	Eternal region beyond the momentary

Unless the above technical significance is understood as utilised at the time of performing Pooja, the Vigraha could not serve its purpose. The different details of a Vigraha are the technical doorways provided for are insight into the true nature of the Deva.

The Vigrahas are only after all an artistic concretization of the extremely philosophical principles explained in the Gnana-Kanda.

No worship of Iswara is possible without some tangible object however subtle in which he should be stationed for the use of meditation.

Even in the highest mental worship the Manas itself serves as a Vigraha.

When you are asked to bring fire you would generally bring a burning piece of fuel ( a match stick or lamp or even with a lighterJ)but not fire by itself.

What is the symbolic of the ‘Visarjan”?

Visarjanam means to sacrifice, to let go. To sacrifice your lower desires that is caused by the Indriyas is called Visarjanam. Since the Vigraha moorti is an analysis of our own self, it is but natural to let go of all the impediments after the ten days festivities ( ten indriyas) are over.

Let’s welcome Lord Ganesha with the five knocks on your head and focus on letting go of all your lower desires for the ten days finally immersing them in the ocean on the 11^th day.

Ganapati Bappa Morya